your typography is very strong in this piece as in the david mamet poster.not a fan of type on an angle, especially in piece like this wherein you've used a strong linear arrangement and bold slab faces.you seem to be sitting on the fence between russian constructivism style and a basic square up.while both of those styles are wonderful, we've seen them.and seen them.so, wondering what you would do if you weren't trying to do something else?i have a feeling it'd be pretty wonderful.love.g.
Post a Comment
1 comment:
your typography is very strong in this piece as in the david mamet poster.
not a fan of type on an angle, especially in piece like this wherein you've used a strong linear arrangement and bold slab faces.
you seem to be sitting on the fence between russian constructivism style and a basic square up.
while both of those styles are wonderful, we've seen them.
and seen them.
so, wondering what you would do if you weren't trying to do something else?
i have a feeling it'd be pretty wonderful.
love.
g.
Post a Comment